Receive Table of Content Alerts

Featured articles in IEEE CIS Transactions/Magazine are selected by the Editor-in-Chiefs on the basis of a number of factors including the perceived likely scientific interest in the paper, its novelty and contribution, its timeliness etc., in order to showcase a diverse and balanced set of topics from their individual Transactions/Magazine. Due to the promotion context of featured articles, the selection is left at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief to identify articles that he/she sees relevant to the promotion. The decision of the Editor-in-Chief is final.

Bridging the Gap Between AI and Explainability in the GDPR: Towards Trustworthiness-by-Design in Automated Decision-Making
Ronan Hamon, Henrik Junklewitz, Ignacio Sanchez, Gianclaudio Malgieri, and Paul De Hert
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Feb. 2022)

Abstract: Can satisfactory explanations for complex machine learning models be achieved in high-risk automated decision-making? How can such explanations be integrated into a data protection framework safeguarding a right to explanation? This article explores from an interdisciplinary point of view the connection between existing legal requirements for the explainability of AI systems set out in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the current state of the art in the field of explainable AI. It studies the challenges of providing human legible explanations for current and future AI-based decision-making systems in practice, based on two scenarios of automated decision-making in credit scoring risks and medical diagnosis of COVID-19. These scenarios exemplify the trend towards increasingly complex machine learning algorithms in automated decision-making, both in terms of data and models. Current machine learning techniques, in particular those based on deep learning, are unable to make clear causal links between input data and final decisions. This represents a limitation for providing exact, human-legible reasons behind specific decisions, and presents a serious challenge to the provision of satisfactory, fair and transparent explanations. Therefore, the conclusion is that the quality of explanations might not be considered as an adequate safeguard for automated decision-making processes under the GDPR. Accordingly, additional tools should be considered to complement explanations. These could include algorithmic impact assessments, other forms of algorithmic justifications based on broader AI principles, and new technical developments in trustworthy AI. This suggests that eventually all of these approaches would need to be considered as a whole.

Index Terms: Law, Decision making, Data models, General Data Protection Regulation, Machine learning algorithms, Deep learning, Security, Decision making, Data models, COVID-19

IEEE Xplore Linkhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9679770

 

Difficulties in Fair Performance Comparison of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms [Research Frontier]
Hisao Ishibuchi, Lie Meng Pang, and Ke Shang
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Feb. 2022)

Abstract: The performance of a newly designed evolutionary algorithm is usually evaluated by computational experiments in comparison with existing algorithms. However, comparison results depend on experimental setting; thus, fair comparison is difficult. Fair comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms is even more difficult since solution sets instead of solutions are evaluated. In this paper, the following four issues are discussed for fair comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: (i) termination condition, (ii) population size, (iii) performance indicators, and (iv) test problems. Whereas many other issues related to computational experiments such as the choice of a crossover operator and the specification of its probability can be discussed for each algorithm separately, all the above four issues should be addressed for all algorithms simultaneously. For each issue, its strong effects on comparison results are first clearly demonstrated. Then, the handling of each issue for fair comparison is discussed. Finally, future research topics related to each issue are suggested.

Index Terms: Social factors, Evolutionary computation, Robustness, Statistics, Optimization, Convergence

IEEE Xplore Linkhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9679762

 

Sometimes the IEEE CIM receives submissions that suffer from poor English usage and readability. Such manuscripts often get rejected because of extremely poor readability. Authors, at their own cost, may take the help of American Journal Experts for pre-submission professional editing services. An author willing to get assistance with English grammar and usage prior to submitting his/her manuscripts for review or during the review process can go directly to https://www.aje.com/en to submit a manuscript for copy editing. Various levels of editing services are available. Cost estimates as well as required time are available immediately on line. We cannot guarantee that the linguistic quality of an edited manuscript will meet your expectation. As expected, an edited manuscript will undergo usual reviews.

Information for Special Issues

IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (IEEE CIM) publishes special issues on emerging topics guest edited by distinguished researchers in computational intelligence. Here is some information about how a special issue is organized.

Phase 1 – Proposal: Interested researchers should submit a proposal for the special issue on an emerging topic in computational intelligence, its application fields, or its closely related areas. The proposal should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of IEEE CIM. The proposal should include at least the following components: the theme of the special issue, its relevance/importance and need in the present context, a list of specific topics, a list of potential authors, a feasible time table, and CVs of all proposed guest editors. Note that, the list of potential authors is needed just to get an idea that there are enough researchers to support such a special issue. The special issue would be organized based on an open call for paper and we do not consider special issues based on papers from a conference.

Guest editors must be senior researchers (at least 5 years beyond terminal degree) with significant publication records directly related to the special issue topic area. Past editorial board experience is not required but highly desirable. No more than 4 guest editors will be approved. One guest editor must be a current associate editor of the IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

Phase 2 – Evaluation: The EiC gets the proposal evaluated by several associate editors of IEEE CIM. They take into account various issues including the technical merit, need and relevance, timeliness, and feasibility of such a special issue. Based on the input from the associate editors, the EiC makes a decision on the special issue proposal. The decision could be acceptance, rejection or a revision of the proposal. A revised proposal may again be reviewed by the some associate editors.

Phase 3 – Call for Papers: If a proposal is accepted, the guest editors are asked to prepare a call for papers (CFP) formatted to one IEEE CIM page so that it can be published in IEEE CIM. The CFP should include all relevant information such as the theme, topics, deadlines, and submission guidelines. The CFP is usually announced through IEEE CIM website, CIS Newsletter and published in the CIS Transactions and Magazine.

Phase 4 – Processing: The review process of submitted special issue papers is handled by the guest editors. The review process for special issue papers is exactly the same as that for regular papers. If a paper is authored by any guest editor, then reviewing of that manuscript will be handled by a different associate editor chosen by the EiC. The typical number of accepted special issue papers is three or four. Due to a severe total page number limitation of IEEE CIM, it is not likely that more than four special issue papers can be published in a single issue of IEEE CIM.

Phase 5 – Publication: Once the special issue review process is complete, the EiC requests the guest editors to write a preface to the special issue (usually not more than 2 formatted transactions pages) for inclusion in the special issue. The special issue is then published as soon as possible. Some general points: We do not encourage guest editors to submit papers to the special issue and under no circumstances the guest editors should submit more than one manuscript to the special issue. Please contact the EiC for further information.

Call for Special Issues

Mandatory Page Charges

Effective from January 1, 2022, papers submitted to this magazine will be imposed mandatory over-length page charge for pages in excess of 10 pages for a regular paper, 15 pages for a survey paper, and 6 pages for a letter. Authors of papers accepted for publication will be assessed a mandatory page charge of $200 (per printed page) for every page* over these limits. The manuscript length (excluding supplementary materials) with over-length page charge must be less than 15 pages for a regular paper, 21 pages for a survey paper, and 9 pages for a letter.

*The over-length page charge is counted as per the number of printed paper pages in the Magazine. The number of pages in the printed paper is dependent on many factors such as compressed figures/images, non-readable tables, and call-outs. In such cases, pages are redesigned or adapted for readability and magazine style. Hence, the number of pages in the printed paper may be higher than the number of the paper pages included in the final file.

Optional Page Charges

After a manuscript has been accepted for publication, the author's company or institution will be encouraged to pay $110 per printed page to cover part of the cost of publication. The page charges are not obligatory, nor is their payment a prerequisite for publication.